Prague Med. Rep. 2015, 116, 225-232
https://doi.org/10.14712/23362936.2015.62
History of Ureteral Stenting Negatively Affects the Outcomes of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy. Results of a Matched-pair Analysis
References
1. 2003) Prognostic factors for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of ureteric stones – a multivariate analysis study. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 37, 413–418.
< , M., Sheir, K., Elsobky, E., Showkey, S., Kenawy, M. (https://doi.org/10.1080/00365590310006255>
2. 2002) Evaluation of a dissolvable ureteral drainage stent in a Swine model. J. Urol. 168, 808–812.
< , B. K., Ferraro, R. F., Madenjian, A. R., Preminger, G. M. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64748-9>
3. 2003) Independent predictors of failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a second-generation lithotripter. J. Endourol. 17, 201–205.
< , D., Karyotis, I., Daskalopoulos, G., Lianos, E., Mavromanolakis, E. (https://doi.org/10.1089/089277903765444302>
4. 2006) Is pre-shock wave lithotripsy stenting necessary for ureteral stones with moderate or severe hydronephrosis? J. Urol. 176, 2059–2062.
< , A., El-Nahas, A. R., Sheir, K. Z. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.022>
5. 2010) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective randomized comparison between stented and non-stented techniques. Urology 75, 45–50.
< , I. A., El-Ghoneimy, M. N., El-Naggar, A. E., Hammoud, K. M., El-Gammal, M. Y., Morsi, A. A. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.071>
6. 2008) Radiographic parameters on noncontrast computerized tomography predictive of shock wave lithotripsy success. J. Urol. 179, 1866–1871.
< , R., Zhao, L., Macejko, A., Thaxton, C. S., Stern, J., Liu, J. J., Nadler, R. B. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.038>
7. 2006) Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J. Urol. 176, 1453–1456.
< , K., Nakashima, J., Nakagawa, K., Asakura, H., Miyajima, A., Oya, M., Ohigashi, T., Murai, M. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.089>
8. 2002) Impact on ureteral peristalsis in a stented ureter. An experimental study in the pig. Urol. Res. 30, 213–218.
, A. C., Lykkeskov-Andersen, H. (
9. 2008) Use of double-J stents prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomized study. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 40, 19–22.
< , A. A. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9030-8>
10. 1995) Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of middle ureteral stones: are ureteral stents necessary? Urology 46, 649–652.
< , S. Y., Pearle, M. S., Soble, J. J., Gardner, S. M., McClennan, B. L., Clayman, R. V. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80294-5>
11. 2009) Pilot study evaluating ureteric physiological changes with a novel “ribbon stent” design using electromyographic and giant magnetoresistive sensors. BJU Int. 103, 1128–1131.
< , R. A., Hruby, G. W., Okhunov, Z., Singh, H., Phillips, C. K., Humphrey, P. A., Gupta, M., Landman, J. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08184.x>
12. 2007) Outcomes using a fourth-generation lithotripter: a new benchmark for comparison? BJU Int. 100, 1356–1360.
< , M. S., Sowter, S. J., Tolley, D. A. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07117.x>
13. 2006) Comparison of a new-generation electroconductive spark lithotripter and the Dornier Compact Delta for ureteral calculi in a quaternary referral center. J. Endourol. 20, 732–736.
< , R. J., Tolley, D. A. (https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.20.732>
14. 2003) Matched pair analysis of shock wave lithotripsy effectiveness for comparison of lithotriptors. J. Urol. 169, 58–62.
< , A. J., Yan, Y., Pattaras, J. G., Andreoni, C., Moore, R., Clayman, R. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64034-7>
15. 1990) Use of double-pigtail stents in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J. Urol. 143, 475–478.
< , J. L., Jenkins, A. D. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)39993-7>
16. 2009) A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi. Urology 74, 1216–1221.
< , H. K. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.076>
17. 2007) Prediction of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteric stones. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 39, 85–89.
< , M., Al-Ansari, A. A., Talib, R. A., El-Malik, El-F., Al-Bozaom, I. A., Shokeir, A. A. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-0104-4>
18. 2012) Stenting or not prior to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? Results of a prospective randomized study. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 44, 731–737.
< , S., Polimeros, N., Kavouras, A., Perimenis, P. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-011-0062-3>
19. 2011) Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Urol. 186, 1328–1335.
, P., Jiang, M., Yang, J., Li, X., Li, Y., Wei, W., Dai, Y., Zeng, H., Wang, J. (
20. 2005) Impact of a double-pigtail stent on ureteral peristalsis in the porcine model: initial studies using a novel implantable magnetic sensor. J. Endourol. 19, 170–176.
< , R., Landman, J., Minor, S. D., Lee, D. I., Rehman, J., Vanlangendonck, R., Ragab, M., Morrissey, K., Sundaram, C. P., Clayman, R. V. (https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2005.19.170>
21. 2011) Prediction of outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi. Urol. Res. 39, 51–57.
< , M., Shi, Q., Wang, X., Yang, K., Yang, R. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0274-5>