Prague Med. Rep. 2021, 122, 181-190
https://doi.org/10.14712/23362936.2021.15
Comparison of the Morse Cone Connection with the Internal Hexagon and External Hexagon Connections Based on Microleakage – Review
References
1. 1983) Osseointegration and its experimental background. J. Prosthet. Dent. 50, 399–410.
< , P. I. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2>
2. 1977) Osseointe-grated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 16, 1–132.
, P. I., Hansson, B. O., Adell, R., Breine, U., Lindström, J., Hallén, O., Ohman, A. (
3. 2017) Implant-abutment connections on single crowns: a systematic review. Oral Implantol. (Rome) 10, 349–353.
< , F. M., Barnaba, P., Mazzoleni, S., Ottria, L., Gargari, M., Zuccon, A., Bruno, G., Di Fiore, A. (https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.349>
4. 2014) Implants with internal hexagon and conical implant-abutment connections: An in vitro study of the bacterial contamination. J. Oral Implantol. 40, 30–36.
< , S., Scarano, A., Perrotti, V., Mulatinho, J., Piattelli, A., Iezzi, G., Tripodi, D. (https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00121>
5. 2017) Microleakage at different implant-abutment connections under unloaded and loaded conditions. Implant Dent. 26, 388–392.
< , J. P., Prudente, M. S., Dantas, T. S., Senna, P. M., Ribeiro, R. F., das Neves, F. D. (https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000568>
6. 2019) Sealing agent reduces formation of single and dual-species biofilms of Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis on screw joints at the abutment/implant interface. PLoS One 14, e0223148.
< , C. A., Conforte, J. J., Caiaffa, K. S., Duque, C., Assunção, W. G. (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223148>
7. 2005) In vitro evaluation of the implant-abutment bacterial seal: The locking taper system. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 20, 732–737.
, S., Warbington, M., Su, M. F., Skobe, Z. (
8. 2012) Leakage of saliva through the implant-abutment interface: In vitro evaluation of three different implant connections under unloaded and loaded conditions. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 27, 551–560.
, C., Miani, P. K., Pedrazzi, V., Goncalves, R. B., Ribeiro, R. F., Faria, A. C. L., Macedo, A. P., Albuquerque, R. B. (
9. 2015) Marginal fit and microbial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of fixed partial prostheses: An in vitro analysis using Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization. J. Prosthet. Dent. 114, 831–838.
< , C., Ikeda, L. N., Pita, M. S., Pedroso, R. C., Pedrazzi, V., Albuquerque, R. B. J., Ribeiro, R. F. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.05.009>
10. 2015) Is the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 19, 229–242.
< , M. C., Pellizzer, E. P., da Silva, E. V. F., da Rocha Bonatto, L., dos Santos, D. M. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-015-0494-5>
11. 2013) One hundred and fifty years of history of the Morse taper: From Stephen A. Morse in 1864 to complications related to modularity in hip arthroplasty. Int. Orthop. 37, 2081–2088.
< , P., Queinnec, S., Flouzat Lachaniette, C. H. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1927-0>
12. 2012) Analysis of the bacterial seal at the implant-abutment interface in external-hexagon and Morse taper-connection implants: An in vitro study using a new methodology. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 27, 1091–1095.
, M., Laporta, M. Z., Curcio, R., Rossi, L. (
13. 2016) In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage at implant-abutment connection: An 11-degree Morse taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int. J. Biomater. 2016, 8527849.
< , H., Raoofi, S., Moattari, A., Bagheri, A., Kalantari, M. H. (https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8527849>
14. 2016) Morse taper dental implants and platform switching: The new paradigm in oral implantology. Eur. J. Dent. 10, 148–154.
, J. P., Pereira, J., Vahey, B. R., Henriques, B., Benfatti, C. A. M., Magini, R. S., López-López, J., Souza, J. C. M. (
15. 2000) Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: An 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 15, 519–526.
, B. R., Hunenbart, S., Belser, U. C. (
16. 2017) Microleakage at the different implant abutment interface: A systematic review. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 11, ZE10–ZE15.
, S. K., Chowdhary, R., Kumari, S. (
17. 2010) Effects of abutment screw coating on implant preload. J. Prosthodont. 19, 458–464.
< , J. K., Choi, J. U., Jeon, Y. C., Choi, K. S., Jeong, C. M. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00595.x>
18. 2016) Removal torque and biofilm accumulation at two dental implant-abutment joints after fatigue. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 31, 813–819.
< , J., Morsch, C. S., Henriques, B., Nascimento, R. M., Benfatti, C. A., Silva, F. S., López-López, J., Souza, J. C. M. (https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4173>
19. 2015) The bacterial sealing capacity of Morse taper implant-abutment systems in vitro. J. Periodontol. 86, 5.
< , R., Ferreira, A., Souza, E., Arcoverde, J., Dametto, F., Gade-Neto, C., Seabra, F., Sarmento, C. (https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.140623>
20. 2010) Preload loss and bacterial penetration on different implant-abutment connection systems. Braz. Dent. J. 21, 123–129.
< , A. P., Fernandes, F. S., Straioto, F. G., da Silva, W. J., Del Bel Cury, A. A. (https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402010000200006>
21. 2014) Correlation between microleakage and screw loosening at implant-abutment connection. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 6, 35–38.
< , C., Ayyildiz, S. (https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.35>
22. 2015) Sealing capability of implant-abutment junction under cyclic loading: A toluidine blue in vitro study. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 13, e293–e295.
, A., Perrotti, V., Piattelli, A., Iaculli, F., Iezzi, G. (
23. 2016a) Evaluation of the sealing capability of the implant healing screw by using real time volatile organic compounds analysis: Internal hexagon versus cone Morse. J. Periodontol. 87, 1492–1498.
< , A., Lorusso, C., Di Giulio, C., Mazzatenta, A. (https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.160076>
24. 2016b) Implant-abutment contact surfaces and microgap measurements of different implant connections under 3-dimensional X-ray microtomography. Implant Dent. 25, 656–662.
< , A., Valbonetti, L., Degidi, M., Pecci, R., Piattelli, A., de Oliveira, P. S., Perrotti, V. (https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000465>
25. 2016c) Evaluation of microgap with three-dimensional X-ray microtomography: Internal hexagon versus cone Morse. J. Craniofac. Surg. 27, 682–685.
< , A., Mortellaro, C., Mavriqi, L., Pecci, R., Valbonetti, L. (https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002563>
26. 2014) Performance of conical abutment (Morse Taper) connection implants: A systematic review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 102, 552–574.
< , C. M., Nogueira-Filho, G., Tenenbaum, H. C., Lai, J. Y., Brito, C., Döring, H., Nonhoff, J. (https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34709>
27. 2012) An in vitro investigation concerning the bacterial leakage at implants with internal hexagon and Morse taper implant-abutment connections. Implant Dent. 21, 335–339.
< , D., Vantaggiato, G., Scarano, A., Perrotti, V., Piattelli, A., Iezzi, G., D’Ercole, S. (https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31825cd472>
28. 2014) Microleakage of the prosthetic abutment/implant interface with internal and external connection: In vitro study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 25, 1078–1083.
< , C. L., Núñez, G. J., Avila, A. A., San Martín, C. L. (https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12217>
29. 2020) Review of the mechanical behavior of different implant-abutment connections. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 8685.
< , A. S., Aroso, C., Salazar, F., López-Jarana, P., Ríos-Santos, J. V., Herrero-Climent, M. (https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228685>
30. 2008) Influence of microgap location and configuration on the periimplant bone morphology in submerged implants. An experimental study in dogs. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 19, 1141–1147.
< , D., Nagata, M. J., Bell, M., Bosco, A. F., de Melo, L. G., Richter, E. J. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01564.x>