Prague Med. Rep. 2024, 125, 15-33
https://doi.org/10.14712/23362936.2024.2
Outcome after Neuro-interventional Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm (as a First Treatment Modality)
References
1. 2013) Comparison of flow diversion and coiling in large unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms. Stroke 44(8), 2150–2154.
< , N., Tjoumakaris, S., Starke, R. M., Gonzalez, L. F., Randazzo, C., Hasan, D., McMahon, J. F., Singhal, S., Moukarzel, L. A., Dumont, A. S., Rosenwasser, R. (https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001785>
2. 2021) Long-term safety and efficacy of distal aneurysm treatment with flow diversion in the M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery and beyond. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 13, 631–636.
< , P., Özlük, E., Korkmazer, B., Ahmadov, R., Akpek, E., Kizilkilic, O., Islak, C., Kocer, N. (https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016790>
3. 2018) Endovascular coiling for cerebral aneurysm: A single-center experience in Egypt. Egypt. J. Neurol. Psychiatr. Neurosurg. 54, 33.
< , M. K. (https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-018-0040-0>
4. 2009) Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke 40, e523–e529.
< , S. P., Sprengers M. E., van Rooij, W. J., Rinkel, G. J., van Rijn, J. C., Bipat, S., Sluzewski, M., Majoie, C. B. (https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.553099>
5. 2005) A multicenter study of 705 ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 26, 1723–1731.
, S., Pasco, A., Cottier, J. P., Gabrillargues, J., Drouineau, J., Cognard, C., Herbreteau, D. (
6. 2022) Effects of intracranial interventional embolization and intracranial clipping on the cognitive and neurologic function of patients with intracranial aneurysms. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 37, 1688–1698.
< , P., Jin, Z., Wang, P., Zhang, X. (https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acac030>
7. 2005) Endovascular treatment with coils of 149 middle cerebral artery berry aneurysms. Radiology 237, 611–619.
< , A., Piotin, M., Mounayer, C., Spelle, L., Weill, A., Moret, J. (https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2372041015>
8. 2020) Factors related to adverse events during endovascular coil embolization for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 12, 605–609.
< , H., Sakai, N., Satow, T., Iihara, K.; JR-NET3 Study Group (https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015459>
9. 2003) Prehemorrhage risk factors for fatal intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke 34(8), 1852–1857.
< , S. (https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000080380.56799.DD>
10. 2006) Angiographic follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: An analysis of 162 cases with 173 aneurysms. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 27, 1107–1112.
, M. H., Gao, B. L., Fang, C., Gu, B. X., Cheng, Y. S., Wang, W., Scotti, G. (
11. 2002) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A randomized trial. Lancet 360, 1267–1274.
< , A., Kerr, R., Stratton, I., Sandercock, P., Clarke, M., Shrimpton, J., Holman, R.; Group International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial Collaborative (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11314-6>
12. 2005) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A randomized comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366, 809–817.
< , A. J., Kerr, R. S., Yu, L. M., Clarke, M., Sneade, M., Yarnold, J. A., Sandercock, P.; Group International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial Collaborative (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67214-5>
13. 2015) The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18-year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Lancet 385, 691–697.
< , A. J., Birks, J., Clarke, A., Sneade, M., Kerr, R. S. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60975-2>
14. 2008) Immediate clinical outcome of patients harboring unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approach: Results of the ATENA study. Stroke 39, 2497–2504.
< , L., Spelle, L., Vitry, F.; ATENA Investigators (https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.512756>
15. 2013) Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Current status. Stroke 44, 2046–2054.
< , L., Wakhloo, A. K. (https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.000733>
16. 2020) Rebleeding and bleeding in the year following intracranial aneurysm coiling: Analysis of a large prospective multicenter cohort of 1140 patients – Analysis of Recanalization after Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm (ARETA) Study. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 12, 1219–1225.
, L., Barbe, C., Herbreteau, D., Gauvrit, J. Y., Januel, A. C., Bala, F., Ricolfi, F., Desal, H., Velasco, S., Aggour, M., Chabert, E., Sedat, J., Trystram, D., Marnat, G., Gallas, S., Rodesch, G., Clarençon, F., Papagiannaki, C., White, P., Spelle, L. (
17. 2006) Endovascular management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 77, 572–578.
< , N., Oskouian, R. J. Jr., Jensen, M. E., Kassell, N. F., Dumont, A. S. (https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2005.078469>
18. 2003) Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 34, 1398–1403.
< , J., Guilbert, F., Weill, A., Georganos, S. A., Juravsky, L., Lambert, A., Lamoureux, J., Chagnon, M., Roy, D. (https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.88563.E9>
19. 2019) Ten-year analysis of saccular aneurysm in the Barrow Ruptures Aneurysm Trial. J. Neurosurg. 132(3), 771–776.
< , R. F., McDougall, C. G., Zabramski, J. M., Albuquerque, F. C., Hills, N. K., Nakaji, P., Karis, J. P., Wallace, R. C. (https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.8.JNS181846>
20. 2000) The detection and management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Brain 123(2), 205–221.
< , J. M., White, P. M. (https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.2.205>
21. 2003) Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 362, 103–110.
< , D. O., Whisnant, J. P., Huston, J. 3rd, Meissner, I., Brown, R. D. Jr., Piepgras, D. G., Forbes, G. S., Thielen, K., Nichols, D., O’Fallon, W. M., Peacock, J., Jaeger, L., Kassell, N. F., Kongable-Beckman, G. L., Torner, J. C. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13860-3>
22. 2022) Stent-assisted coiling vs. coiling alone of ruptured tiny intracranial aneurysms: A contemporary cohort study in a high-volume center. Front. Neurol. 13, 1076026.
< , G., Wu, Y., Wei, Y., Xue, G., Chen, R., Lv, N., Zhang, X., Duan, G., Yu, Y., Li, Q., Xu, Y., Huang, Q., Yang, P., Zuo, Q., Liu, J. (https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1076026>