Prague Med. Rep. 2025, 126, 231-237
https://doi.org/10.14712/23362936.2025.36
Plastic of Smile: Adhesive Fixed Dental Prosthesis, Fiberglass Post Restoration, and Direct Veneers in Resin Composite
References
1. , K. E., Li, K. Y., Murray, C. A. (2017) Longevity of fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures (FRC FPD) – Systematic review. J. Dent. 61, 1–11.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.007>
2. , A. O., Manta, D. F., Lopes, M. J. P., da Silva Pedrosa, M., da Silva, C. H. V., de Almeida Durão, M. (2018) Prefabricated composite resin veneers: A clinical case report. Braz. Dent. Sci. 21(1), 119–125.
<https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2018.v21i1.1514>
3. , V., Ketineni, H., Sabiha, P. B., Akarapu, S., Mittapalli, S. P., Khan, A. (2022) Comparative evaluation of different post materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated teeth using the finite element analysis method: A systematic review. Cureus 14(9), e29753.
4. , A. C., Guilardi, L. F., Wandscher, V. F., Pereira, G. K., Valandro, L. F., Rippe, M. P. (2020) Surface treatments of a glass-fiber reinforced composite: Effect on the adhesion to a composite resin. J. Prosthodont. Res. 64(3), 301–306.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.09.001>
5. , G. C. D., Nakanishi, L., Isolan, C. P., Jardim, P. D. S., Moraes, R. R. D. (2019) Bond stability of universal adhesives applied to dentin using etch-and-rinse or self-etch strategies. Braz. Dent. J. 30(5), 467–475.
<https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201902578>
6. , K., Opdam, N. J. M., Laske, M., Bronkhorst, E. M., Demarco, F. F., Correa, M. B., Huysmans, M. C. D. N. J. M. (2017) Longevity of anterior composite restorations in a general dental practice-based network. J. Dent. Res. 96(10), 1092–1099.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517717681>
7. , M. F., Espíndola-Castro, L. F., Lins-Filho, P. C., Teixeira, H. M., Guimarães, R. P. (2020) Influence of different thermopolymerization methods on composite resin microhardness. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 12(4), e335.
<https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.56772>
8. , M. M. M., Nour, K. A., Mustafa, D. S. (2024) Effect of saliva contamination and different decontamination protocols on microshear bond strength of a universal adhesive to dentin. Braz. Dent. Sci. 27(2), e4159.
<https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2024.e4159>
9. , L. F., Monteiro, G. Q. M., Ortigoza, L. S., da Silva, C. H. V., Souto-Maior, J. R. (2019) Multidisciplinary approach to smile restoration: Gingivoplasty, tooth bleaching, and dental re-anatomization. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 40(9), 590–599.
10. , J., Xu, Y., Si, L., Li, X., Fu, B., Hannig, M. (2021) Long-term clinical performance of composite resin or ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper. Dent. 46(1), 25–44.
<https://doi.org/10.2341/19-107-LIT>
11. , J. R., Miller, T., Xu, X., Burgess, J. O. (2002) In vitro evaluation of the retention of composite fiber and stainless steel posts. J. Prosthodont. 11(1), 25–29.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2002.00025.x>
12. , C., Ferrari, M. (2011) Current perspectives on post systems: A literature review. Aust. Dent. J. 56, 77–83.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01298.x>
13. , Z., Zafar, M., Qasim, S., Shahab, S., Naseem, M., AbuReqaiba, A. (2015) Advances in nanotechnology for restorative dentistry. Materials (Basel) 8(2), 717–731.
<https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8020717>
14. , B., Özcan, M. (2022) Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in maxillary anterior crown fractures: A 4-year clinical evaluation. Oper. Dent. 47(2), 138–148.
<https://doi.org/10.2341/20-162-C>
15. , T. W., Tan, S. K., Li, K. Y., Burrow, M. F. (2023) Survival and complication rates of resin composite laminate veneers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Evid. Based Dent. Pract. 23(4), 101911.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101911>
16. , M. L., França, F. M. G., Basting, R. T., Turssi, C. P., Amaral, F. L. B. (2021) Long-term bond strength of glass fiber post to composite resin does not depend on surface treatment with silane coupling agent or universal adhesive. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 110, 102931.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102931>
17. , J., Sezinando, A., Monteiro, P. C. (2013) Effect of substrate age and adhesive composition on dentin bonding. Oper. Dent. 38(3), 267–274.
<https://doi.org/10.2341/12-307-L>
18. , G., Huertas-Mogollón, G., Mendoza-Martiarena, Y., Ayala, G., Watanabe, R., Alvitez-Temoche, D., Mayta-Tovalino, F. (2020) Comparison of the resistance of bond strength of cemented fiberglass posts in different root thirds with and without silanization: An ex vivo study. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 21(3), 262–266.
19. , G. H., Gomes, É. A., Silva-Sousa, Y. T., Pinelli, R. G. P., Sousa-Neto, M. D., Pereira, G. K. R., Spazzin, A. O. (2018) Mechanical properties and superficial characterization of a milled CAD-CAM glass fiber post. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 82, 187–192.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.03.035>
20. , M. C., Azevedo, L., Fonseca, P., Viana, P. C., Araújo, F., Villarinho, E., Fernandes, G. V. O., Correia, A. (2023) The success rate of the adhesive partial fixed prosthesis after five years: A systematic review. Prosthesis 5(1), 282–294.
<https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5010021>
21. , J. A., Luz, M. S., Pereira-Cenci, T. (2016) Ferrule effect: A meta-analysis. JDR Clin. Trans. Res. 1(1), 31–39.
22. , C. J., Valdivia, A. D. C. M., da Silva, G. R., Santana, F. R., Menezes, M. de S. (2012) Longitudinal clinical evaluation of post systems: A literature review. Braz. Dent. J. 23(2), 135–740.
<https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402012000200008>
23. , D. S., Sailer, I., Ioannidis, A., Zwahlen, M., Makarov, N., Pjetursson, B. E. (2017) A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 28(11), 1421–1432.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13007>
24. , D., Wohlrab, T., Saure, D., Krisam, J., Frese, C. (2018) Fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses: A 4-year prospective clinical trial evaluating survival, quality, and effects on surrounding periodontal tissues. J. Prosthet. Dent. 119(1), 47–52.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.02.008>



